Not much to report in Astroland today, so I got curious, how are they performing against other teams? And what's the problem?
Alright, so here's what I found as far as winning percentage against teams above .500:
Los Angeles Dodgers: .571 (44-33)
Philadelphia: .537 (36-31)
Atlanta: .521 (38-35)
San Francisco: .521 (37-34)
Houston: .474 (37-41)
St. Louis: .472 (25-28)
Colorado: .459 (34-40)
Florida: .457 (32-38)
San Diego: .409 (38-55)
NY Mets: .394 (37-57)
Milwaukee: .386 (27-43)
Arizona: .369 (31-53)
Cincinnati: .369 (24-41)
Pittsburgh: .368 (25-43)
Chicago Cubs: .352 (19-35)
Washington: .268 (22-60)
Notice a few things here:
1. It's easy to see how the Dodgers are almost 30 games over .500 - they've won 44 out of 77 games against teams better than .500.
2. The Cardinals are so far ahead of anyone else in the NL Central because they're 60-33 against teams with records below .500. That's a pounding.
3. The Cardinals (53) and the Cubs (54) have played the fewest games against teams over .500. And the Cardinals are 6.5 games better against those teams than the Cubs. Even that up and the Cubs are only 2 games behind St. Louis.
Showing posts with label Standings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Standings. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
Projecting the NL Central
It's an over-simplified way of doing it, but the Astros are 10 games back with 38 to play, including three coming up with St. Louis. St. Louis is 72-54, Chicago is 62-60, the Astros are 61-63, and Milwaukee is 61-64. Let's pretend that every other team stays within their exact winning percentage for the rest of the season. That means...
St. Louis: 93-69
Chicago: 83-81
Milwaukee: 79-83
To catch the Cardinals, who would theoretically go 21-15, the Astros would need to go 32-6. Did I get that math right? Do I really care?
St. Louis: 93-69
Chicago: 83-81
Milwaukee: 79-83
To catch the Cardinals, who would theoretically go 21-15, the Astros would need to go 32-6. Did I get that math right? Do I really care?
Minor League Standings Check
Let's look in to see where Eddie's Farm stands:
PCL American, South
Texas League, South (2nd half)
Calfornia League, South (2nd half)
SAL, South (2nd half)
NYPL Stedler
Appalachian League, West
GCL East
PCL American, South
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Albuquerque | 72 | 57 | - | 7-3 | L1 |
Okla. City | 64 | 64 | 7.5 | 4-6 | W1 |
New Orleans | 56 | 71 | 15 | 6-4 | L1 |
Round Rock | 55 | 74 | 17 | 2-8 | L5 |
Texas League, South (2nd half)
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Midland | 33 | 22 | - | 7-3 | W1 |
Frisco | 29 | 26 | 4 | 6-4 | W2 |
Corpus | 25 | 30 | 8 | 6-4 | L2 |
San Antonio | 24 | 31 | 9 | 4-6 | W1 |
Calfornia League, South (2nd half)
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
High Desert | 31 | 25 | - | 7-3 | W4 |
Lancaster | 27 | 29 | 4 | 6-4 | W1 |
Lake Elsinore | 26 | 30 | 5 | 5-5 | W3 |
Rancho Cuca. | 26 | 30 | 5 | 3-7 | L4 |
Inland Empire | 21 | 35 | 10 | 2-8 | L7 |
SAL, South (2nd half)
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Asheville | 35 | 19 | - | 6-4 | W5 |
Augusta | 33 | 22 | 2.5 | 6-4 | L1 |
Bowling Green | 27 | 27 | 8 | 2-8 | L6 |
Greenville | 27 | 28 | 8.5 | 7-3 | L1 |
Savannah | 25 | 27 | 9 | 5-5 | W3 |
Rome | 25 | 28 | 9.5 | 5-5 | L2 |
Charleston | 23 | 30 | 11.5 | 6-4 | W1 |
Lexington | 22 | 33 | 13.5 | 2-8 | W2 |
NYPL Stedler
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Lowell | 35 | 26 | - | 7-3 | W4 |
Oneonta | 32 | 27 | 2 | 5-5 | L2 |
Vermont | 28 | 33 | 7 | 4-6 | W1 |
Tri-City | 21 | 38 | 13 | 6-4 | L1 |
Appalachian League, West
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Elizabethton | 40 | 19 | - | 7-3 | W4 |
Johnson City | 31 | 26 | 8 | 4-6 | L2 |
Kingsport | 26 | 30 | 12.5 | 8-2 | W3 |
Bristol | 22 | 36 | 17.5 | 4-6 | L2 |
Greeneville | 22 | 36 | 17.5 | 3-7 | L4 |
GCL East
Team | W | L | GB | Last 10 | Streak |
Marlins | 34 | 16 | - | 7-3 | W2 |
Nationals | 31 | 17 | 2 | 10-0 | W11 |
Cardinals | 22 | 27 | 11.5 | 4-6 | L1 |
Mets | 20 | 30 | 14 | 2-8 | L1 |
Astros | 16 | 33 | 17.5 | 3-7 | L4 |
Monday, August 17, 2009
Oh, how the Astros have fallen
On July 24 the Astros were 50-46, tied with the Cubs, and 1.5GB of the Cardinals for first place. Let's look at the standings, as of July 24:
On this day, CoolStandings gave the Astros' their best odds of making the postseason at 20.4%. What do the standings look like, from July 25-today?
Ouch.
Team | Record | GB | RS | RA |
StL | 53-46 | - | 436 | 401 | CHC | 49-45 | 1.5 | 401 | 388 | HOU | 50-46 | 1.5 | 407 | 423 | MIL | 48-48 | 3.5 | 446 | 457 | CIN | 44-51 | 7 | 387 | 455 | PIT | 43-53 | 8.5 | 411 | 418 |
On this day, CoolStandings gave the Astros' their best odds of making the postseason at 20.4%. What do the standings look like, from July 25-today?
Team | Record | GB | RS | RA |
StL | 14-6 | - | 103 | 82 | CHC | 11-10 | 3.5 | 115 | 103 | MIL | 10-11 | 4.5 | 118 | 132 | HOU | 7-15 | 8 | 93 | 150 | CIN | 6-16 | 9 | 78 | 99 | PIT | 3-17 | 11 | 57 | 127 |
Ouch.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Questioning the "overall weakness" of the NL Central
I'm getting pretty sick and tired of "major" media outlets comparing the NL Central to the retirement home's bowling league. ESPN and Baseball Prospectus both had pieces about the Cubs today questioning the competitiveness of the NL Central (basic gist: "The Cubs suck, yet are still 2GB"). So I did some looking...
The NL Central, outside of the division, but within the NL, has a winning percentage of .517 (109-102).
The NL East? .462 (90-105)
The NL West? .522 (95-87)
Or how about the American League, again: outside the division but within the League?
AL East: .525 (105-95)
AL Central: .428 (89-109)
AL West: .528 (94-84)
So basically we see the breakdown as follows, in order of winning percentage:
AL West: .528
AL East: .525
NL West: .522
NL Central: .517
NL East: .462
AL Central: .428
So we see from here that the NL Central is 4th among the six divisions in winning percentage outside the division, but still well above .500. The weakest division? Looks from here to be the AL Central, trailing the NL East. But don't tell ESPN, they won't like that.
I will say this: If you think this is flawed, let me know why, and we'll rework it. I don't want to be accused of using numbers to suit my own purposes...
The NL Central, outside of the division, but within the NL, has a winning percentage of .517 (109-102).
The NL East? .462 (90-105)
The NL West? .522 (95-87)
Or how about the American League, again: outside the division but within the League?
AL East: .525 (105-95)
AL Central: .428 (89-109)
AL West: .528 (94-84)
So basically we see the breakdown as follows, in order of winning percentage:
AL West: .528
AL East: .525
NL West: .522
NL Central: .517
NL East: .462
AL Central: .428
So we see from here that the NL Central is 4th among the six divisions in winning percentage outside the division, but still well above .500. The weakest division? Looks from here to be the AL Central, trailing the NL East. But don't tell ESPN, they won't like that.
I will say this: If you think this is flawed, let me know why, and we'll rework it. I don't want to be accused of using numbers to suit my own purposes...
Labels:
Baseball Prospectus,
ESPN,
Standings
Friday, April 24, 2009
The 7% Solution
Nice link from Citizen Chris with the CoolStandings odds on the post-season to this point in the season. I noticed this towards the end of last season on ESPN's standings page, but I didn't realize they would do it this early.
Anyhow, good news, I guess. The Astros have a 7.1% better chance of going to the playoffs than they did in 2005! In the Top Comebacks section our Houston Astros on June 7, 2005 had a 0.2% chance of making the playoffs. Of course they went to the World Series, where they had a 50% chance of winning, and got smoked.
This is an interesting site, as the Red Sox and Yankees have the same record, at 9-6, yet the Red Sox are given a 51% chance of making the postseason while those Yankees sit at 20.7%. As of today the Astros are given a 3.5% chance of winning the NL Central, a 3.8% chance of winning the Wild Card. Add that up, and there's your 7.3% chance of making the playoffs.
How do they do it? I'll just let you read it.
Anyhow, good news, I guess. The Astros have a 7.1% better chance of going to the playoffs than they did in 2005! In the Top Comebacks section our Houston Astros on June 7, 2005 had a 0.2% chance of making the playoffs. Of course they went to the World Series, where they had a 50% chance of winning, and got smoked.
This is an interesting site, as the Red Sox and Yankees have the same record, at 9-6, yet the Red Sox are given a 51% chance of making the postseason while those Yankees sit at 20.7%. As of today the Astros are given a 3.5% chance of winning the NL Central, a 3.8% chance of winning the Wild Card. Add that up, and there's your 7.3% chance of making the playoffs.
How do they do it? I'll just let you read it.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Cecil Cooper versus the World!
It's interesting. Cecil Cooper's reign as manager of the Houston Astros. Let's take a look:
2007: Coop takes over after Garner's firing on August 27 when the Astros are 58-73, immediately goes out on the 28th and loses 7-0 to St. Louis - finishes the season 15-16.
vs. ATL: 2-1
vs. CHC: 3-3
vs. CIN: 3-0
vs. MIL: 2-4
vs. NYM: 0-3
vs. PIT: 2-1
vs. StL: 4-3
Home: 8-7
Away: 7-9
2008:
vs. ARI: 2-4
vs. ATL: 3-3
vs. CHC: 9-8
vs. CIN: 12-3
vs. COL: 3-3
vs. FLA: 2-4
vs. LAD: 4-3
vs. MIL: 5-8
vs. NYM: 5-2
vs. PHI: 3-4
vs. PIT: 8-8
vs. SD: 3-3
vs. SF: 7-1
vs. StL: 7-8
vs. WAS: 4-2
Home: 47-33
Away: 39-42
This includes the "home games" in Milwaukee. The Astros were also outscored by 31 runs, making their Expected W-L record 77-84. So they were 9 games better than expected and were 21-21 in 1-run games.
Notice the Astros were 8-8 against Pittsburgh. Want to hear something strange? The only other teams that Pittsburgh was .500 or better against: Cincinnati (9-6), San Francisco (4-2) and St. Louis (10-7).
2007: Coop takes over after Garner's firing on August 27 when the Astros are 58-73, immediately goes out on the 28th and loses 7-0 to St. Louis - finishes the season 15-16.
vs. ATL: 2-1
vs. CHC: 3-3
vs. CIN: 3-0
vs. MIL: 2-4
vs. NYM: 0-3
vs. PIT: 2-1
vs. StL: 4-3
Home: 8-7
Away: 7-9
2008:
vs. ARI: 2-4
vs. ATL: 3-3
vs. CHC: 9-8
vs. CIN: 12-3
vs. COL: 3-3
vs. FLA: 2-4
vs. LAD: 4-3
vs. MIL: 5-8
vs. NYM: 5-2
vs. PHI: 3-4
vs. PIT: 8-8
vs. SD: 3-3
vs. SF: 7-1
vs. StL: 7-8
vs. WAS: 4-2
Home: 47-33
Away: 39-42
This includes the "home games" in Milwaukee. The Astros were also outscored by 31 runs, making their Expected W-L record 77-84. So they were 9 games better than expected and were 21-21 in 1-run games.
Notice the Astros were 8-8 against Pittsburgh. Want to hear something strange? The only other teams that Pittsburgh was .500 or better against: Cincinnati (9-6), San Francisco (4-2) and St. Louis (10-7).
Labels:
Cecil Cooper,
Standings
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)