Friday, October 18, 2013

White Sox sign Jose Abreu, Astros fall short

So it turns out the White Sox have, in fact, signed Jose Dariel Abreu for 6yrs/$68m. It's the largest contract for an international player, by a lot. Via this timeline put together by the Crawfish Boxes, we find a tweet I missed from Buster Olney..

So there are a few things I'm choosing to take away here:

1) When I moved to New York, I immediately sought out and became friends with the two other Texans in our small town. We became fast friends, and having some familiarity in a totally different place brought The Wife and I a lot of comfort. So that Abreu took a deal with the White Sox, who already have Alexei Ramirez and Dayan Viciedo - both from Cuba - should not be surprising. They know what he'll be going through, and provide an instant support system for Abreu.

2) For those of you who said, "You didn't really expect the Astros to spend money, did you?" you're missing the point. That the Astros were among the front-runners according to both Buster Olney's and's Jesse Sanchez's sources means that there was legitimacy to the Astros' interest. I don't think it's fair to write off the Astros as posturing for Abreu just to make the fanbase happy. This isn't Jon Heyman writing a friendly Boras column - to generate enough interest that both ESPN and write it up is legitimate. The Astros just got beat on this one.

3) One of my first thoughts was, "Well, if you're going to go to $60m, what's $10m more?" But that's not how this front office works. Remember there is a Director of Decision Sciences on staff. It's fine if you don't agree with it, but you just know there are a variety of projections for Abreu that made him worth the $50-60m range, but not $68m.

4) Did the Astros bid high enough on Abreu to generate some publicity, knowing that Abreu probably wouldn't take the deal (the White Sox are too perfect for Abreu, anyway)? Maybe, but that's a pretty high-risk gamble to make - $60m for a few mid-October headlines/tweets.

5) I do think the Astros' interest was legitimate. I just also think they stick pretty hard and fast to their projections and process. Of course $68m for Abreu means...

Back up the truck, Crane. Money, mouth, etc.


Anonymous said...

Whatever the case, probably a missed opportunity to leap forward in the recovery process. Abreu, Storen (for Singleton), and Springer would have helped take a big step forward next year, and probably contend sooner.

Anonymous said...

WTH? Why would we trade last years #1 first base prospect whose not even legal drinking age yet for a guy who had a shitty year pitching only 60 innings? Did Storen go to UH too? Is that why we love him here? I wouldn't even trade Fontana for Storen.

Anonymous said...

Storen did have a rough middle of last year, but that is what opened the window of opportunity to try to get him. He should be a top tier closer for the next many years, and would be affordable for the Astros if they could pry him away.

Reuben said...

From what we've seen of Luhnow's trading tendencies, I think he's far more likely to trade a closer for a top hitting prospect than the other way around.

The Rays seem to have a similar philosophy on closers: don't pay mega-bucks for them, it's not that hard to find someone to replace them when they leave. It's worked out pretty well for them.

Anonymous said...

See Melancon, Mark. Despite his strong year, I think we were all happy to have Lowry and now Carter, Stassi, and Peacock.