Runs to Hits Ratio: National League

So I was thinking, because I've been sick the last couple of days: Man, the Astros seem to be able to hit the ball (kind of), but they sure don't score many runs. How do they compare to the rest of the National League? It's a valid question, and there's a valid answer. Regard:

As of this morning, 1-16 in total runs:hits ratio

Rank	Team	Runs	Hits	R:H Ratio
1	Philadelphia	145	226	.642
2	St. Louis	148	251	.590
3	Colorado	125	215	.581
4	Chicago	123	217	.567
5	Los Angeles	151	267	.567
6	Florida	126	224	.563
7	Milwaukee	121	222	.545
8	Pittsburgh	118	227	.520
9	Washington	121	238	.508
10	San Diego	108	214	.505
11	New York	118	238	.496
12	Arizona	99	201	.493
13	Cincinnati	102	211	.483
14	Atlanta	105	218	.482
15	Houston	106	233	.455
16	San Francisco	90	205	.439

Everyone realizes what this means, right? It basically takes 2+ hits to get one run for the Astros. And while the Astros rank 12th in the NL in runs, they're 5th in hits. That's a bad ratio. Obviously.