Batting Stats
| Time Frame | W-L | Runs/Gm | Avg/SLG/OBP | K:BB rate | XBH% |
| G1-25 | 8-17 | 2.9 | .235/.281/.323 | 3.32 | 26.0% |
| G26-50 | 9-16 | 3.1 | .226/.282/.326 | 2.34 | 26.9% |
| G51-75 | 12-13 | 4.3 | .248/.306/.375 | 2.23 | 31.4% |
| G76-100 | 12-13 | 3.9 | .248/.320/.382 | 1.73 | 30.3% |
Pitching Stats
| Time Frame | W-L | RunsAll/Gm | ERA/WHIP | K:BB rate | Inher. Run% |
| G1-25 | 8-17 | 5.0 | 4.42/1.45 | 2.08 | 39% |
| G26-50 | 9-16 | 4.7 | 4.40/1.48 | 2.09 | 33% |
| G51-75 | 12-13 | 5.5 | 4.95/1.57 | 1.85 | 40% |
| G76-100 | 12-13 | 4.6 | 4.19/1.32 | 2.91 | 27% |
A couple of things we should note:
*The Astros haven't gone through a 25-game span where they've actually averaged more runs per game than their opponent.
*They were 12-13 when posting their worst numbers as a pitching staff (helped by almost half of the inherited runners scoring. Thanks, bullpen.), and they were 12-13 when posting their best numbers as a pitching staff.
*Over the last 50 games, the Astros are 24-26.
Since June 1, here are your updated NL Central standings:
Milwaukee: 27-24
Cincinnati: 26-24
St. Louis: 25-23
Houston: 24-25
Chicago: 22-27
Pittsburgh: 14-33
The problem is, from the start of the season to May 31, the standings were as such:
St. Louis: 30-22
Cincinnati: 30-22
Chicago: 24-18
Milwaukee: 21-30
Pittsburgh: 21-31
Houston: 17-34
Typically, the Astros got off to such a lousy start, and don't have much to work with in the first place, that this season is pretty much done. So Astros: Pretty please, with a cherry on top. Trade the players.
